PATRIARCHALITY IS GUILTY FOR EVERYTHING

Main Article Content

Ana Ashtalkovska

Abstract

Even in the contemporary literature patriarchality is damned to be the key reason for women’s discrimination on the Balkans and in wider frame also. We are pointing out the fact that this definition of patriarchality is no longer relevant. Many examples from the field work materials are showing the existence of woman subculture in the traditional community and its belonging to the real model of thinking and acting, which is often neglected in different studies. This overlooked fact is contributing to the large amount of controversies when it comes to gender questions in the traditional community. In that sense, we are arguing many generalizations connected to gender issues among which, placing woman in the marginalized groups as very risky and pretentious one.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ashtalkovska, Ana. 2016. “PATRIARCHALITY IS GUILTY FOR EVERYTHING”. EthnoAnthropoZoom/ЕтноАнтропоЗум, no. 5 (November), 170-87. https://doi.org/10.37620/EAZ0550171a.
Section
Articles / Статии

References

Barret Stanley R., Anthropology: A Student’s Guide to Theory and Method,
University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Buffalo, London 1996.
2. Rapport Nigel, Overing Joanna, Social and Cultural Anthropology, The Key
Concepts, Routledge, London and New York 2005.
3. Grozdan Katerina V., Razvojot na pravata na `enite niz
istorijata (de facto i de jure), str. 307 - 329, Balkan Yearbook of Human
Rights, Minority rights, Balkan human rights network 2004.
4. Filipovi¢ Milenko S., ^ovek meÚu qudima, Beograd 1991
5. Svetieva Aneta, Statusot na `enata vo tradiciskata selska
zaednica i semejstvoto, str. 26 - 42, EtnoAntropoZum, br.1, Skopje
2001.
6. Rihtman - Auguštin Dunja, Struktura tradicijskog mišljenja, Zagreb 1984
7. Risteski Ljupčo, The Woman in Macedonian Folk Culture, 91 - 115, Gender
Relations in South Eastern Europe: Historical Perspectives on Womanhood and
Manhood in 19th and 20th Century, Belgrade - Graz 2002.
8. Papić Žarana, Polnost i kultura - telo i znanje u socijalnoj antropologiji,
Beograd 1997.
9. Pavi¢evi¢ Aleksandra, Narodni i crkveni brak u srpskom seoskom
dru{tvu, Etnografski institut SANU, Beograd 2000.
10. Obrembski Jozef, Folklorni i etnografski materijali od Pore~e,
Kniga I, Redakcija Vra`inovski Tanas, Sostavile: Tanas
Vra`inovski, Jovanovska Sowa, Karaxoski Vladimir, ISK-Matica
makedonska, Skopje 2001.
11. Obrembski Jozef, Makedonski etnosociolo{ki studii, Kniga 2,
Redakcija Vra`inovski Tanas, Sostavile: Tanas Vra`inovski,
Jovanovska Sowa, Karaxoski Vladimir, ISK - Matica makedonska,
Skopje 2001.
12. Jovanovi¢ Petar, Pore~e, Srpski etnografski zbornik, kw. LI,
Naseqa i poreklo stanovni{tva, kw. 28, SKA, Beograd 1935.
8
13. A{talkovska Ana, @enata nerotka i odnosot na tradicionalnata
selska zaednica kon nea, str. 248 - 269, EtnoAntropoZum, br.1, Skopje
2001.
14. A{talkovska Ana, Predbra~ni seksualni odnosi vo narodnata
kultura na Pore~e - tabu tema i realna sostojba, str. 411 - 425, 70
godini od istra`uvawata na Jozef Obrembski vo Makedonija, Prilep
2002.